Posted on: Thursday, July 13th, 2006 by Resa Laru Kirkland
"Or else, we will be very, very angry with you, and we will write you a letter telling you how angry we are."--Hans Brix to Kim Jong Il, from the movie TEAM AMERICA WORLD POLICEIt had to be said. You may not like it, it may sound childish, but when dealing with commies, adult rationale doesn't work. Besides... it's always fun to say "I told you so," even when it's about a commie.And once again, we are dealing with commies.North Korea launched, as one reporter put it, "six scuds and one dud." In case you've been in a coma, that's the long and short of the past couple of days. Seven missiles from the land of No Dongs, with 3 or 4 more on deck.Fortunately, the one Tae Podong 2 missile they launched lived up to its MADE IN KOREA stereotype. In apparent similitude to this "Queer" Leader--perfectly appropriate given his insane fagatronics--it fizzled into impotence only 42 seconds after launch.Thank goodness it wasn't as effective as the first Tae Podong 2 test. No, not the one they shot across the Sea of Japan in 1998. I'm talking about the one you didn't hear about (http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm). The one that in spite of knowing it exists, everyone continues to avoid. You might ask, "Why would they deny the existence of the Tae Podong 2 that hit the coast of Alaska in 2003?"The answer: Because that one worked. (De(a)r Leader Has Landed, March, 2003, http://north-korea.narod.ru/Resa_LaRu_Kirkland.htm)Which leads us to wonder: What went wrong with this one?I suppose the reasons are multiple. North Korea is more broke than ever. It takes a lot of money to pay for all the alcohol, broads, and Daffy Duck movies that Kim Jong Il just can't get enough of. And then there's his fleet of Benzs. Yes, the pressures on the little leader go waaaay beyond some measly search for food like all the unimportant peons in his country. I mean, come on. And in spite of having nukes courtesy of Dr. Khan (http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29473) and Pakistan--which Kim then gave to Iran two years ago under the guise of exchanging "farming strategies"--the crackdown on arms shipments has obviously put a dent into the NK budget. With Saddam in prison, Osama in hiding, and the Palestinians strapped for cash, the Queer One is in a real pickle right now. All of his buyers are otherwise occupied, and he's no longer the subject of their attention. This frustrated movie maker lives for drama, and resents the spotlight shining more brightly on Iran and Israel than it has on him. That simply won't do."Why is everyone so f*****g stupid? Why aren't people more intelligent, like me?"--Kim Jong Il, from the movie TEAM AMERICA WORLD POLICESigh. OK, so what do we do about it?On Bill O'Reilly July 5, John Kasich's guest rolled out the "Blame America" carpet. According to (http://www.warchick.com/2005/120105.htm) "Weasley" Clark--brace yourself for this shocker!--Bush is to blame. He claims that Clinton was on the right track and all was rainbows and butterflies until the 2000 election, when Bush had the nerve to call North Korea by the only appropriate name: Evil. By Clark's cowardly logic, poor North Korea is only reacting to our mean name-calling. Screw the fact that the entire reason they have nuclear capability is thanks to the Clinton administration's pandering.In defiance of all logic--a commie cornerstone(-http://www.warchick.com/2006/051506.htm)-Clark even admitted that North Korea began immediately cheating after the 1994 non-proliferation agreement that stopped us at the brink of renewed fighting with them. Yet still he advocated being nice to them and even paying them to be good--a new and radical idea that has only been tried a few hundred times. Apparently, this time is different because he double stamped it, no quitsies, no crossies count.People, how is it that "diplomacy" will work this time in spite of the fact that it never has, not even briefly, in the past? Haven't we done this the hippy way long enough? I mean, North Korea has not kept a promise, treaty, pact, agreement; EVER. For the Weasley impaired, I'll spell that out: E-V-E-R. They have repeatedly delayed or walked out of scheduled talks, and they demand meeting with America alone, something that would be disastrous. Why? Two reasons: 1) North Korea is a master manipulator. They don't want to piddle around with second-rate powers like China or Japan; they want the big dog on the block. They want to negotiate Palestinian style (who never EVER keep their word either)--to posture for the world that if we dare to defend ourselves WHEN they attack--Palestinian "you'll take our bombings and LIKE it!" logic with Israel--the ensuing blood bath will be our fault. There's no point setting ourselves up for that; and 2) Appearance is EVERYTHING for tyrants and hippies. Screw the truth. We are talking about people who deny the decade of starvation of their own people and who STILL claim that the Korean War began when America attacked. These are people too terrified to even tell the truth about where their leader was born, for crying out loud. (http://etherzone.com/2003/kirk051203.shtml) Kim is the perfect poker player--he knows that you don't have to have a full hand to win; you only have to make everyone else think that you do. (And having a few heavily armed henchmen never hurts either.) If he succeeds in forcing us to the table on his terms, he will have achieved a dramatic political coup.How do you reason with that?The answer is you don't.Kim is a despot whose own nation is so wretched, so backwards, so reminiscent of the evils of Hitler and Stalin that it is hard to comprehend such a place even exists. But then, it was hard to believe the stories coming out of Europe in the 1930's, too. It didn't make them any less true. If history has proven anything, it is that Totalitarians only understand one thing--stopping them by force(http://etherzone.com/2003/kirk111103.shtml). That is the language they understand. There has never, ever, EVER been one who has "seen the light" or stopped of his own accord. NEVER. They have all been forced to stop, and have taken as many good people with them as they could when they finally did go down. And in every single case, the cost wouldn't have been nearly as high if we had actually learned from history and nipped them in the bud at the first sign of evil--ahem, Palestinians, Munich, 'nuff said--rather than waiting until our choices were gone and war was upon us. Their version of reasonable behavior has always been "Do as I say and get out of my way." And those who don't agree are removed from the equation. That is logical and reasonable to a Totalitarian Dictator; it is all a Total Dic understands. And that is how you deal with them. (http://etherzone.com/2003/kirk080403.shtml)Diplomacy has never worked with pure, determined evil. It didn't work with Hitler, Mussolini, Hiro Hito, Stalin, Mao, both Kims, Saddam, Arafat, Pol Pot, Khomeini, Ahmadinejad, Gadaffi, ad infinitum. Not once, not ever... E-V-E-R. (Get it, Weasley?) We cannot risk continuing with a tactic that has failed over and over again for more than 60 years--especially not when we also have in our history one tactic that did work, and worked well. Diplomacy NEVER rid the world of men such as these; force, however, has done it every time. EVERY TIME.I was a guest recently on Casey Hendrickson's radio show out of Las Vegas (http://www.kxnt.com/). He is by far one of the most intelligent men it has been my pleasure to know. We spoke in length about history--what was, what is, and given historical references, what might be. And we both came to the same chilling conclusion: Osama was right. Much as we hated to admit it, we had to. The nasty little devil nailed it.He was right when he called us a "Paper Tiger." Osama stated that he planned the attack on the Cole and 9/11 as a direct result of our pulling out of Somalia. (Hope you're happy, Murtha.) When he saw us cut and run--Clinton style--he believed he could beat us, much the same way General Giap of the VC (http://www.warchick.com/2005/102305.htm) stopped his plans for unconditional surrender when he saw, to his amazement, Walter Cronkite lying about the Tet Offensive. The course of the war, and history, was dramatically altered. We huff and we puff, but we never blow the house down. That makes our "huff and puff" useless, to the utter delight of the little pigs.By the "logic" of the left, or the lack thereof, you can apparently find a gallon of spoiled milk in your fridge and put it back in, vowing to try again tomorrow under the fantasy that it will no longer be spoiled.We are going to lose this war if we continue on this repeatedly failed course. The fact that we are considering ONLY an angry letter--not even sanctions, for pete's sake!--to Kim is beyond comprehension to everyone except Total Dics. They were counting on it. After all, they know how to learn from history, too.It is a wicked generation who keeps asking for signs. We have had signs enough. The only thing left to decide is which road we are going to take.Ronald Reagan, where are you?Keep the faith, bros, and in all things courage.
Articles by Resa Laru Kirkland
Previous Page :: Main Page