The Tyranny of the Atheist Minority
Posted on: Tuesday, May 20th, 2008 by Renaissance Men
Daily there are news reports of atheists:
*offended by prayers at graduations and football games;
*offended by a Cross or Star of David;
*offended by Christmas carols or patriotic hymns;
*offended by Christmas trees and menorahs;
*offended by the Ten Commandments or "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance;
*offended a teacher might hint there may be a Creator;
*offended a soldier said "God bless you" at a funeral;
*offended the Boy Scout Oath says "Do my duty to God and my country"; or
*offended by a cross on a Veterans Memorial.
Whereas basic Christian teaching is to forgive when offended, these atheists, when offended, protest, intimidate, threaten and sue to have their will enforced as law.
But exactly how many atheists are in America, anyway?
USA Todaypublished Feb. 25, 2008, the results of the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey, conducted byThe Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
This survey "of the people" reported that80.2 percent of Americans hold Judeo-Christian beliefs(51.3 percent Evangelical/Mainline Protestant Christian; 23.9 percent Catholic; 1.6 percent Orthodox & other Christian; 1.7 percent Mormon; and 1.7 percent Jewish.)
Those not reporting or who said nothing in particular represented 12.9 percent, while 1.2 percent were Unitarian-Universalist-Spiritual-New Age-Native; 0.7 percent Buddhist; 0.6 percent Muslim; 0.4 percent Hindu; 0.3 percent Other World Religions, 2.4 percent agnostic ... andonly 1.6 percent atheist.
Imagine that – only 1.6 percent atheists, yet their beliefs are becoming the law of the land.
Aminority forcing its will on the majority– isn't this the classic definition oftyranny?
Americans may as well be back in colonial times when the king of England used government to enforce his minority views.
The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776, stated:
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absoluteTyrannyover these States. ... A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define aTyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
In accepting the Democrat Party's re-nomination for president, June 27, 1936, Franklin D. Roosevelt stated:
In 1776, we sought freedom from thetyranny of a political autocracy– from the 18th centuryroyalists who held special privileges from the crown. It was to perpetuate their privilege thatthey governed without the consent of the governed; that they denied the right of free assembly and free speech; thatthey restricted the worship of God.
Roosevelt explained America's founders fought the Revolution so "the people" could be their own rulers.
Abraham Lincoln agreed in his Gettysburg Address, Nov. 19, 1863:
That this nation,under God, shall have a new birth of freedom – and thatgovernment of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Alexander Hamilton said in New York's ratification debates, June 21, 1788:
The will of the peoplemakes the essential principle of the government.
Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1816:
Try ... every provision of our Constitution, and see if it hangs directly onthe will of the people. (A.E. Bergh, Writings, 15:32)
James Madison wrote in Philadelphia, Jan. 31, 1792:
The past frequency of wars [is traced] to a will in the government independent ofthe will of the people.
But is the will of the people still reflected in government?
Are the people still their own rulers?
Lincoln warned in his First Inaugural Address, 1861:
The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made ...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers.
In order to see if the government reflects the beliefs of the people, one must find out what the people believe.
Similar to the Pew Survey noted above, theCIA.govwebsite'sWorld Factbook(2007) reported that80.2 percent of the U.S. population holds Judeo-Christian beliefs.
The American Religious Identification Survey(2001), conducted by The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, reported that77.8 percent of the U.S. population holds Judeo-Christian beliefs(52 percent Protestant, 24.5 percent Catholic, 1.3 percent Jewish).
The rest of the population was 0.5 percent Muslim; 0.5 percent Buddhist; 0.5 percent Agnostic; 0.4 percent Hindu; 0.3 percent Unitarian-Universalist; 0.1 percent Wiccan-Pagan-Druid; 13.2 percent Secular; 6.3 percent Spiritualist-Native American-Baha'i-New Age-Scientology-Humanist-Deist-Taoist-Eckankar ... andonly 0.4 percent atheist.
According to these surveys, between 77.8 percent to 80.2 percent of the current U.S. population holds Judeo-Christian beliefs, and only 0.4 percent to 1.6 percent of Americans hold atheistic beliefs.
AHarris Poll(2003) reported90 percent of Americans believe in God; aNewsweek poll(2007) reported91 percent of Americans believe in God; and aFox News poll(2004) reported92 percent of Americans believe in God.
If the will of majority of "the people" is not reflected in the laws, then the country is no longer "democratic," but has devolved into a tyranny, where a minority forces its will upon the majority.
Could it be thatthe current debate over religion in Americais not between the "religious right" and the "liberal left," but rather itis a debate between the will of the majority and the will of, as George Washington warned in his Farewell Address, "an artful and enterprising minority"?
Could it be that the struggle isbetween a constitutional republic with representatives elected "by the people"and thedespotism of, as Lincoln put it,"an eminent tribunal"?
Could it be that the battle is actuallybetween American democracy and tyranny?
In his classic wisdom, President Ronald Reagan stated:
Sometimes I can't help but feel the First Amendment is being turned on its head. ... The First Amendment of the Constitution was not written to protect the people from religion; that Amendment was written to protect religion from government tyranny (Reagan, 1984 radio address).
The First Amendment has been twisted to the point that freedom of religion is in danger of becoming freedom from religion. (Reagan, Oct. 13, 1983, Q & A Session with the Press)
To those who cite the First Amendment as reason for excluding God ... may I just say: The First Amendment of the Constitution was not written to protect the people of this country from religious values; it was written to protect religious values from government tyranny (Reagan, March 15, 1982, to Alabama State Legislature).
Founding Fathers ... enshrined the principle of freedom of religion in the First Amendment. ... The purpose of that Amendment was to protect religion from the interference of government and to guarantee, in its own words, "the free exercise of religion." (Reagan, 1982 radio address)
The Constitution was never meant to prevent people from praying; its declared purpose was to protect their freedom to pray (Reagan, 1982 radio address).
Well-meaning Americans in the name of freedom have taken freedom away. For the sake of religious tolerance, they've forbidden religious practice (Reagan, May 6, 1982, National Day of Prayer, White House).
The frustrating thing is that those who are attacking religion claim they are doing it in the name of tolerance and freedom and open-mindedness. Question: Isn't the real truth that they are intolerant of religion? (Reagan, Aug. 23, 1984, Ecumenical Prayer Breakfast).
In the last two decades we've experienced an onslaught of such twisted logic that if Alice were visiting America, she might think she'd never left Wonderland. We're told that it somehow violates the rights of others to permit students in school who desire to pray to do so. Clearly, this infringes on the freedom of those who choose to pray. ... To prevent those who believe in God from expressing their faith is an outrage (Reagan, Sept. 25, 1982, Ceremony for Prayer in Schools).
Refusal to permit [religious exercises] is seen not as the realization of state neutrality, but rather as the establishment of a religion of secularism (Reagan, 1984 radio address).
After reviewing America's poll numbers and Reagan's responses in today's climate of ACLU lawsuits, hate-crime legislation, secular revisionism and activist judges trumping the will of the people –one wonders about the future of Lincoln's hope:
That government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Related special offer:
"Backfired: A Nation Born for Religious Tolerance no Longer Tolerates Religion"
“
Three Secular Reasons Why America Should Be Under God”http://www.amerisearch.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=36&osCsid=ef8e7cd6a6469642b6924baa54f146c3
Bill Federer,www.AmericanMinute.comwjfederer@aol.com314-487-4395,P.O. Box 20163,St. Louis, MO 63123
To subscribe to the American Minute emails or purchase Bill Federer’s books – visitwww.AmericanMinute.comor call 1-888-USA-WORD
Permission granted to forward, quote or reprint this article.
You are being sent this email because you are on Bill Federer’s personal email list. To be removed from this list, simply click Reply with the subject “remove from list.” Thank you.
Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight?Get new twists on family favorites at AOL Food.Articles by Renaissance Men
Either You Are, Or You Aren't a Renaissance Woman!
A renaissance woman is someone who sets her own agenda for personal achievement and will not allow herself to be manipulated or intimidated by self-proclaimed spokesmen who try and wrap their political philosophies around terms like "equality," "choice," "peace," "tolerance" and "diversity." She understands that she has been created for such a time as this and embraces her destiny as a challenge and not a curse, no matter what her personal circumstances. She is a winner not a whiner, a leader not a follower, a victor, not a victim. She wants to change the paradigm of the feminist movement that has served to marginalize and ridicule women who do not follow their collective agenda.
Millions of women around the country, from all professions, backgrounds and cultures, are courageously picking up the mantel of leadership and virtue, that the feminist movement has squandered. They are providing thoughtful and accurate analysis, on a variety of issues, of where, and who we are as a nation.
Remember, this is not a club. It is a mindset!
Categories
- Abortion
- America at War
- Culture
- Domestic Violence
- Education
- Environment
- Event Announcements
- Faith
- Feminism
- Foreign Affairs
- Free Speech
- Gun Control
- Historical View
- Hollywood
- Homosexuality
- Inspirational
- International Relations
- Internet Safety
- Judicial Nominations
- Leadership
- Legislative Issues
- Liberals
- Miscellaneous
- Morality
- Politics
- Population Control
- Pornography
- President Bill Clinton
- President George Bush Sr.
- President George W. Bush
Renaissance Women
Profiles, images and commentaries written by the following spokeswomen:
- Alveda King
- Amy Nyhuis
- Ann Coulter
- April Sampson-Kelly
- Barbara Ferguson
- Barbara Howard
- Barbara LeDeen
- Becky Norton Dunlop
- Cathy Cleaver
- Ceci Royals
- Cheryl Felicia Rhoads
- Cindy Jacobs
- Deanna Gelak
- Deborah Perry
- Donna Pisani
- Donna Rice Hughes
- Donna Wiesner
- Eileen Audrey Wilder
- Erika Harold
- Evelyn Joe
- Frances Rice
- Governor Sarah Palin
- Jane Abraham
- Janis Erickson
- Jeane Kirkpatrick
- Jill Griffith
- Jill Kamp Melton
- Josette Shiner
- Kandace Kenyon
- Karin Agness
- Katharine DeBrecht
- Kay Daly
- Kay Coles James
- Kellyanne Conway
- Kerri Houston
- Kim Alexis
- Laura Ingraham
- Lindsey Lorinovich
- Lisa Bevere
- Lorraine Coconato
- Mariam Bell
- Marianne Clyde
- Marie Jon
- Marsha West
- Michele Fletcher
- Michelle Easton
- Michelle Malkin
- Nancy Coen
- Nina May
- Pam Pryor
- Pat Allen
- Pat Kempthorne
- Paula Dobriansky
- Rashida Jolley
- Rebecca Hagelin
- Renaissance Men
- Resa Laru Kirkland
- Sandra Swann
- Susan Au Allen
- Suzanne Scholte
- Tricia Erickson
Join Our Mailing List
Receive Newsletters, Special Offers, and Regular Bulletins from Renaissance Women
